There’s been a lot of debate recently following an online survey asking readers for their “must read” SF list, the issue being that less that 10% of the suggested books were by women. Why, it was asked, the overwhelming bias?
Various explanations – and solutions – to this woeful state of affairs were put forward. Many pointed out that there is no lack of women working in the genre. From the writers themselves, through the often female-dominated corridors of the publishing industry, to the many women readers, we are everywhere. The problem is not absence but invisibility. Women’s writing is, by and large, being published, but apparently not reviewed, reprinted or talked about.
To me it all seems to come down to the same issue. Women are brought up to be mild-mannered and self-effacing. Girls do less well in mixed schools because their male classmates hog the teachers’ attention. Women have a cliched reputation for being talkative, but scientific observation has proved time and time again that in a mixed group, men do more of the talking and are far more likely to dominate the conversation. This is the real obstacle we are facing as women SFF writers – not active sexism or bias, but something entrenched deep in our culture, a potent mix of nature and nurture that drowns the female voice everywhere. Even we women are guilty of buying into this silencing, every time we worry that by standing up for women we are sticking our heads above the parapet and asking to be labeled as harridans or, perish the thought, feminists.
The fact that women’s voices can make themselves heard, without any apparent fuss, is proved by one writer currently in the limelight. Last month Lauren Beukes won the prestigious Arthur C Clarke award for her novel “Zoo City”. Now I haven’t read it yet, though a copy is sitting on my iPad waiting patiently, but I have a feeling that what attracted the nominations was not simply the quality of the book but the visibility of the author. Beukes is a South African journalist, a career that certainly isn’t for shrinking violets, so it’s hardly surprising that she is outgoing and fearless in the face of male domination of her genre. However she goes about it with such canny charm: stuffed toys based on elements from her books accompany on her public appearances, simultaneously disarming and attracting everyone she meets. She talks to everyone, and soon has them eating out of the palm of her hand.
Of course not everyone can follow her example – we’re not all that brave and extroverted. But it does show that, as the old saying goes, you attract more flies with honey than with vinegar. If there’s going to be any positive discrimination going on, it needs to be just that: positive. No whining, no apologies for making a fuss; simply tell the world about all the damned good SF and fantasy that just happens to be written by women.
Postscript: on checking my own blog, I have realised to my shame that, of the six books I have reviewed, only one is by a woman. Part of that is because I have been researching the competition, and my corner of the genre is dominated by men. Currently on my TBR pile are Servant of the Underworld by Aliette de Bodard and Romanitas by Sophia McDougall. However I would very much like to find more women writers to review, so if you know of anything suitable, please give your suggestions in the comments! I’m looking for recently* published fantasy with a strong historical flavour, either real-world or secondary-world – but preferably no dragons, which bore the pants off me
* I have read – and loved – The Curse of Chalion, and will probably review it some time, but it’s several years old and I’d like to focus on new works.





I think you’re spot on. The only way to change this is by not whining about it but stand up and be proud of your book.
Have you read Gail Carriger’s books (Soulless, Changeless and Blameless)? Urban fantasy set in Victorian London. A bit different and I thoroughly enjoyed them.
On my TBR pile I have Anno Dracula by Kim Newman, seems more like an alternative history/fantasy/horror book that’s also set in Victorian England.
I haven’t read Gail Carriger, but I’ve heard good things – definitely one to add!
I’ve read some of Newman’s Dracula fiction (Red Reign?) but you do know Kim is a guy? With a big moustache
Just noticed that it even says MR Kim Newman on the cover.
Doh!
I’m looking at my voting ballot for the Hugos: 4 of 5 nominees for best novel are female, 2 of 5 for novellas, 2 of 4 for short stories, 4 of 7 for best editor (long form). Additionally, Connie Willis won the Nebula this year for best novel.
Are women perceived equal to men in this field? Possibly not, but how biased it is really depends on where and how you look.
I agree that women seem to be doing a lot better at being recognised this year – and long may it continue! Obviously there will be variations from once year to the next and between different sources of information. Also, when the numbers involved are low, as in the Hugo shortlists, it’s impossible to draw any statistically valid conclusion; on the other hand the bias in the online survey referred to is undeniable!
I mostly agree. The point I stop is the one that criticises the ‘whining’ and negativity. Whilst I know what you mean and I think I agree with what you’re getting at, this is, in itself… negativity. It’s important to recognise that the complaining that can put people off is also a valid expression of genuine frustrations. There’s a lot of feminist literature from the sixties (such as the Society for Cutting Up Men (SCUM)) with which I vehermently disagree. The negativity and anti-male out-pouring seems incredibly misguided to me, and in many ways counter-productive. Yet it was also incredibly important and deserves to be recognised, but not silenced. What brings a woman to a state where she would rather cut up men than try to live with them? (Even if one interprets it as slightly tongue-in-cheek, it’s powerfully vicious.) I’m not saying I want to praise such invective today – it’s a different time, different pressures are felt and different measures required. However, the ‘negativity’ so often complained about is a valid out-pouring, and I worry about the pressure to suppress one’s grief and tiredness of living in a world where women still face sexism on a day to day basis.
Yes, encourage positivity. Ultimately, it’s more helpful; usually, it’s more just. But there’s a danger in this back-lash against pointing out faults and highlighting the areas of our society that are still warped and problematic. It’s not just our fault for not putting ourselves forward and being bubbly and likeable. Again – I don’t think that’s what you intended to say, but this is the uneasiness I feel when reading so many posts that press for silence of negativity whilst praising positiveness. Better, if you don’t feel the need to express the outlet that other women do, to simply praise the positive and step back from being negative about negativity.
And now, because I’m getting sick of all this backlash and counter-backlash, and because I spent too long sticking my neck out and getting trampled on in years gone by and have become the sort of coward my younger self would have been ashamed of… I shall duck out. Whilst I’m sure you can be relied upon to discuss sensibly I find Internet debates too taxing. It’s an anxiety thing, and I hope you can forgive my dropping a comment and running away and understand that I don’t intend this comment as any great criticism of you personally, just a voicing of my qualms of the dangerous waters I find lurking behind these pleadings I’ve seen a lot of lately that people stop talking about the problems and focus on being positive.
Don’t worry, I don’t see it as a personal attack! I’m rubbish at clever debate – I just throw some thoughts out there and see what everyone else thinks
Every revolution has to start out with extreme ideas, in order to rouse people to action, and feminism was no different. Negativity and criticism have far more impact than saying “let’s just all be nice to one another for a change”! My point was that it’s too easy to get bogged down in negative, circular debates that don’t appear to be having much practical effect. One can be critical in a positive way, just as one can critique a manuscript without shredding the writer’s ego!
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/113203-favorite-fantasy-written-by-a-woman
Now there are a few listed really good women writers.
well perhaps the story needed more depth.
As for saying dragons bore you
One of my fav is Melanie Rawn and hers Dragon series which is more about magic and the mind rather than the dragons.
Wendy
It’s not the depth of story, it’s just the dragons, full stop. Sometimes it feels like every single new fantasy series I pick up owing to its political intrigue in a unique fantasy setting, just waits until it has me hooked then turns into “ZOMGdragons!!!” Even George ****ing R R Martin…
I guess I’m just scarred for life
The majority of authors that I’ve read in my life have been women, so I’ve never noticed this bias, but in thinking about it, the problem does become obvious.
Funny how personal choices create perception though, eh?